Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Dave Strenski: New Energy for Detroit

January 20, 2012 by  
Filed under Solar Energy

Comments

25 Responses to “Dave Strenski: New Energy for Detroit”
  1. jacsobrien says:

    Well done…going? to your site right now.

  2. solarpanellights says:

    I invent the Future of Solar Light technology ! There is nothing worldwide even come close to my Prototypes ! It saved 80%-90% of Material and Costs! It also can be used to grow up Foot!? Full Waterproof also and a complete Solar revolution! I hope i find an Investor to bring it on the Market! have a look on my Chanel if you like the working Prototypes! It es already Patent Pending!? With my Invent its first Time possible to use Solar technology in Areas where they now Solar only from TV!

  3. youngman760 says:

    HERES ALL? THE DETAILS..JUST REMOVE THE SPACES WHEN YOU TYPE IT IN YO? BROWSER..ht tp ://959b2hk8m1nxcp1g4h16u7w7tv.­hop­.clickbank. net/

  4. Michiganstategem says:

    that is one of coolist stes ive seen?

  5. mosesmoses2000 says:

    jesus is coming soon!!

    (thepriceof gas? is still high)

    Receive Jesus, zoe eternal life. He will cause you to be born again a new creation. 2 cor 517 21, Jn :3 16.

    Vote Ron Paul for President 2012.

    ronpauldotcom/

    endtimedotcom

    gcnlivedotcom

    infowarsdotcom

    swrcdotcom

  6. Scattnam says:

    I hate liberal cullists? who fuck around, lets have themn linched.

  7. CEGAinc says:

    Great? Stuff

  8. 36ironworkers says:

    watch ironworkers solar project 2011?

  9. paul8kangas says:

    We build Geo thermal houses everywhere.
    Just going down 12 ft, gives you? enough FREE heat to keep your
    house at 55 F year round
    If you build houses the way we do.
    Then when we add Solar, the house is off the grid
    year round.
    See our house:
    Youtube:: sol fest 208

  10. jayemiller1982 says:

    Being an Ypsilanti Citizen I am proud of this; but, Mayor Paul Schreiber is a plague to? the city. The video would have been more effective by not highlighting him.

  11. st8detroit says:

    nice? video thanks! love Ypsi!

  12. itsrickinaz says:

    See Power of the Sun by Redstorm. Solar energy statistics incorporated into? electronic music.

  13. itsrickinaz says:

    Fantastic!?

  14. SanEverett says:

    The big unions ruined MI! And the worst thing is most of the people believe what the unions tell? them while their cities crumble..

  15. DirectorLincoIn says:

    @Thiiz? you read my mind, haha xD

  16. rachjessee says:

    i live in ypsilanti and the ypsilanti food co-op is literally three blocks away from my house. i was so proud to see this commercial. i had no idea they were doing this. i love that there’s people in my community fighting? to find alternative sources of energy and help our planet out a little. :)

  17. nevaldry111 says:

    BRING SEARCHSTORIES BACK!!!!! :( ?

  18. StefanKahler says:

    @tyu3456?

    well, that is what i also mean^^

  19. tyu3456 says:

    @StefanKahler? Bing Is Not Google

  20. StefanKahler says:

    Google is better? than Bing

  21. pete2872 says:

    dang I wanna? do something like that. That guy’s a genius

  22. CI9TK says:

    @MrWastedfate Now even the Muppets know you’re a liar. When calculating efficiency, the total can never exceed the worst efficiency in the system.
    The crooked never include Nuclear fuel PRODUCTION when talking about energy. Mining,? milling, refining and prep is COSTLY and ENERGY intensive.
    Nuclear fuel is a net loss. Why make it?
    Cost? Taxpayer pays.
    Energy used to make? Countries using it for electricity want bombs.
    Reprocessing warheads save but spent fuel? Not really.
    The Sun IS free.

  23. MrWastedfate says:

    @CI9TK
    In that case, the current average? for fuel input to energy output for nuclear reactors is 57.6%. You probably left nuclear reprocessing out of your calculations completely.

    Panels in space suffer much more degradation than panels on earth, and have to be replaced almost once per decade. The United States actually generates more electricity from burning wood than they do solar power.

  24. CI9TK says:

    @MrWastedfate Oh, I don’t know WHAT you are doing WASTING your time on YouTube when there are so many UNSOLVED crimes you could solve…
    Steam is? Steam (and – News flash: Electrons are Electrons) so your CLAIM that they are BOTH 33% efficient means you’re comparing the SAME turbine electric generation vendor equipment in a different plant. WE did fuel input to energy output. YOU F’TARD!
    Satellites are Solar powered – Zero maintenance.
    Let’s hear MORE “statistics” from your crowded butthole,..

  25. MrWastedfate says:

    @CI9TK

    If your definition of nearly forever is 20-25 years, then yes. It will last nearly forever. They, like everything else also require routine maintenance.

    Your figure for coal power plants is also very vague. Are you saying steam input to electrical output efficiency? Because for both nuclear and coal, that is about 33% efficiency, not 8 and 20. And as far as total electrical output.

    On top of that, less than? 1% of our energy currently comes from solar power, and only 2% from wind.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!